SLFP Proposals fail to meet the mark, says Dr. Imtiyaz

Dr.A.R.M. Imtiyaz, of Colombo, Sri Lanka is a visiting scholar at the Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. His articles have been published in several journals and presented in the international conferences on ethnicity. His primary research interest is in the study of ethnic conflict, both in Sri Lanka and in other countries.

He recently spoke to Iqbal Ali of popular Colombo Tamil Daily “Thinakkural”. Translation of the interview published on May 27th, 2007 is as follows:

Q: How do you view the current political developments in Sri Lanka?

A: After their independence, countries have failed to change the political realities of the post colonial period. And changes from modernization and resulting social pressures failed miserably as they were not adequately addressed by the political leaderships. We see the consequences of this in majority of the post colonization countries. In greater Asia – Sri Lanka, India and Middle Eastern countries face this while Sudan, Somalia and Ethiopia in Africa stand out as examples of this situation.

The political status that prevails in Sri Lanka today can be easily understood through approaching this within principles of Political Science.

Q: In that case do you see the Freedom struggle of Tamil Eelam is a result of this political process?

A: Generally whenever political communities erroneously develop or create rules and regulations that favor only a particular ethnic group or religion it results in conflicts. This is like how a child will show dissatisfaction toward parents if there was imparity between the parents and other children of the family. In the same manner, an affected community will show its displeasure towards the government and its dominating ethnic group.

This is a common phenomenon of all political communities. Post independence, the ruling classes’ adapted pro Sinhala policies. The Sinhala only policy of 1956, 1972 Constitution, standardization in higher education, deliberate Sinhala colonization and ethnic cleansing of Tamils did not give any hope to the Tamils. In the same token these policies did not help to pave the way to create patriotism of the country, among all minorities. Contrarily, the pro Sinhala policies divided the people of Sri Lanka. They resulted in Tamil people to relying on the freedom struggle. The birth of deadly groups such as the LTTE is a consequence or child of such pro Sinhala policies

Q: The Government of Sri Lanka and International community consider the LTTE as a terrorist organization. In the meantime majority of the Tamils see them differently. How do you view the LTTE?

A: History will determine if an organization is a freedom movement or a terrorist organization. The duty of a Political Scientist is to observe and research a community. I can’t say anything regarding whether LTTE is a terrorist organization or not. But I can say one thing. When a society enforces policies discriminatingly, chances are higher for political organizations to rise. The affected people will not live peacefully wherever they live. This is demonstrated by the history of the world.

Q: The party in power SLFP, recently put forwarded District Councils as solution for the ethnic problem. However, the Tamil parties and Muslim Congress have rejected this proposal. What is your opinion?

A: The solution for the ethnic problem in Sri Lanka is to fulfill the aspirations of the minority communities. In this regard, the minority communities have already lost faith in the Sinhala dominated government. Particularly, the Tamils don’t count on the government or its other agencies. Even in bigger political communities “political confidence” is important. When an ethnic or religious community loses faith in the government, it results in “political tension”.

The only avenue to avoid this dangerous deterioration is creating mutual understanding and trust. How to do this? In accordance to the concepts of Political Science, power sharing could lead the way in winning the trust. The minority communities must be free to conduct their affairs in their regions through their representatives.

Everyone could see that Sri Lanka Freedom Party’s “District Council” proposal fails to meet this political mark. Therefore there is no hope that this proposal will help bring about a political solution. Proposals such as these not only will win the trust of the minorities but they will only help to further erode the trust in the government by affected minorities.

[Translated by K. Thirukumaran]

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Print this page

4 Comments

  1. Political Science Theory is simple to undersand. All right thinking people will agree that it is a simple principle, if a parent favours one child and descriminates the others, they are going to rebel. So wise parents would never show farouriism.

    There is a saying in Tamil, ‘Barking dogs do’nt bite, you know it and I know it, but does the dog know it?

    Does Rajapakse know it?

  2. Dr Imtiaz is one of those who analyses the Lankan situation in perspective and dispassionately. There is very little doubt the people whose hopes were raised by the assurances in the Mahinda Chintana that peace, which Ranil’s UNP ushered in to a degree in 2001-2004, will be enhanced.

    This, unfortunately, did not happen. Yesterday, we saw the 2nd Claymore mine blasted within a week – taking with it several innocent lives. Tamils in Cbo and elsewhere will suffer the consequences – albeit below the surface. How many Capital cities in the world engage the horror of Claymore Mines? Families are perishing in multiple numbers – including little children. People have taken the law into their own hands as the arson in Delgoda showed. Businessmen and others in the Tamil community are being abducted in greater frequency even after assurances to the contrary from the Chief of Police and the head of Govt. The middle class is managing with 2 meals a day. Do you need any further evidence of a total breakdown of a once steady society? Economists predict the US$ to fetch over Rs150 soon. Hotels are empty.

    GoSL is only looking for a scapegoat to hide their sins, weaknesses and inability to govern. We are making enemies of our traditional friends in the international community.

    It is not an exaggeration to say pious Buddhists, Christians, Hindus and Muslims are praying for a change in their lot – in terms of the CoL and security – and the restoration of Sri Lanka as a country for all communities that lived in it for so long.

  3. Amazing ingnorance in SL. One group is oppressing another, simple as that. Just like a landlord oppressing a servant girl, or tenant. Egos love to oppress others (whoever they can), or be subserviant to enhance thier little egos. Unfortunately, we have 30 year war due to simple egoic need. SL need leaders who can transform the collective mind sets, and usher new paradim shifts. This is almost a spiritual job. All men are created equal, well, all men will be equal in death too. So why can’t all men live equal? oh well…..

  4. Dear Dr.Imtiyaz, in recent months I lost contact with you partly because of my new email address and partly because of limited health. I wish you all the best
    s.j.emmanuel

Comments are closed.